Murder In The Morning | Daily True Crime News

Five college students from Assumption University in Worcester, Massachusetts, appeared in court Thursday, accused of luring a man to their campus through a dating app and attacking him in what police say was an attempt to stage a "Catch a Predator" scenario popularized on TikTok. The students, Kelsy Brainard, 18; Easton Randall, 19; Kevin Carroll, 18; Isabella Trudeau, 18; and Joaquin Smith, 18, were arraigned on charges of conspiracy and kidnapping. A sixth defendant, a juvenile, is facing separate charges. All five defendants entered not-guilty pleas, and they are scheduled to return to court for a pre-trial conference on March 28. Police say that the victim, a 22-year-old active-duty military service member, was visiting Worcester in October to attend his grandmother's funeral. According to the police report, he was seeking company and turned to Tinder, where he matched with a woman whose profile identified her as 18. She invited him to campus, where she greeted him and led him into a basement lounge. There, a group of students emerged, accusing him of being a pedophile and wanting sex with underage girls. "The group started calling me a pedophile, and I just didn’t know what was going on," the victim later told police. "Before I knew it, they were chasing me to my car." The victim managed to break free, but he was chased by the group and assaulted. "I was punched in the head, and my car door was slammed on me as I tried to get away," he said. Surveillance footage from the campus shows the students filming the incident with their phones, laughing and high-fiving, while they continued to accuse him of being a predator. Randall later told police that the group had been inspired by the “Catch a Predator” trend on TikTok. The group had used the dating app to lure the man to campus, then spread word through their dormitory chat group, claiming they had caught a predator on campus. After the incident, Brainard falsely reported to police that the man was a sexual predator, claiming that he had arrived uninvited and that she had texted a friend to chase him away. Surveillance footage from the campus, however, contradicted her account. "There was no evidence that he was seeking sexual relations with underage girls," the police report stated. “The whole thing was staged.” Brainard, who faces an additional charge of witness intimidation, was also accused of trying to silence others involved in the incident. A male student involved in the assault faces an additional charge of assault and battery with a dangerous weapon. The group is due back in court for further proceedings. After the court appearance, attorneys for the defendants remained firm in their defense. Christopher Todd, Brainard’s lawyer, stated, “We’re just looking forward to having the process play out.” Robert Iacovelli, the lawyer for Trudeau, filed a motion seeking dismissal of the charges against her, claiming there was no probable cause for the allegations. The students were ordered not to have any contact with the victim as they await their next court date in March. The case has drawn attention due to the disturbing trend of internet-driven stunts and the serious criminal charges the students now face.    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

A chilling new chapter has emerged in the ongoing legal saga surrounding Sean “Diddy” Combs, as explosive allegations and legal counterclaims dominate headlines. In a case that intertwines power, violence, and justice, the latest revelations include harrowing testimony from accuser Ashley Parham and contentious claims from Courtney Burgess, who alleges possession of incriminating evidence against the music mogul. These accounts, combined with Combs’s defamation lawsuit, paint a complex picture of one of the entertainment industry’s most controversial figures. In a recent interview on NewsNation’s Banfield, Ashley Parham recounted a night in 2018 that she claims changed her life forever. Parham alleges she was gang-raped by Sean “Diddy” Combs and three others, including his associate Shane Pearce, at a secluded house in Orinda Hills, California. The property, owned by Combs’s former chief of staff Kristina Khorram, served as the backdrop for a harrowing ordeal that Parham describes as a “kill or be killed” situation. According to Parham, the assault began when the group took turns raping her, with Combs allegedly sexually violating her both anally and vaginally. She claims that during the attack, Khorram attempted to insert a copper IUD into her cervix at Combs’s behest, an act she narrowly escaped when the device malfunctioned. Parham’s detailed account includes an alleged moment of defiance: she armed herself with a knife and considered using it to defend herself against Combs. “He was lying down on the stairs, and I had the knife in both of my hands,” Parham told Banfield. Ultimately, she chose not to act, citing her “moral compass.” Parham’s claims extend beyond physical violence. She alleges that Combs, enraged after the assault, used a television remote to further violate her. In a shocking turn, she accused Combs of firing a gun at her, forcing her to flee to a neighbor’s home for safety. Despite the neighbor’s offer of refuge, Parham returned to the house, a decision she later attributed to a sense of hopelessness. “Honestly, if they had killed me that night, I wouldn’t have cared at that point,” she admitted grimly. The Contra Costa Sheriff’s Department investigated Parham’s claims after she filed a report on March 23, 2018. However, the case was deemed “unfounded,” a conclusion that has drawn scrutiny given the high-profile nature of the accused. Combs’s legal team has pointed to this finding as evidence of his innocence, asserting that he has documentary proof that he was not in Orinda on the date in question. “There is no evidence that Mr. Combs was ever even in the same room as Ms. Parham,” his attorneys stated. While Parham’s testimony sheds light on alleged past actions, Courtney Burgess’s claims strike at the heart of Combs’s public defense. Burgess, a former music industry figure, alleges possession of videos depicting Combs in non-consensual sexual encounters, some involving minors. He claims the videos were provided to him by an intermediary connected to Kim Porter, Combs’s late ex-partner and mother of three of his children. Burgess also asserts that he received a rough draft of Porter’s memoir, which reportedly contained damaging revelations about Combs. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In a move that surprised precisely no one following her case, Lori Vallow Daybell, the self-styled "Doomsday Mom," has filed a motion to dismiss her Arizona case, alleging a violation of her right to a speedy trial. Citing constitutional guarantees that demand a trial within 150 days of arraignment, Vallow claims Arizona’s justice system is dragging its feet, leaving her, inexplicably, as the one tapping her watch in impatience. The motion, as blunt as it is brazen, accuses the court of wasting time: “The State of Arizona has had plenty of time to figure this out!” wrote Vallow, who is representing herself in what promises to be another theatrical performance of legal acrobatics. Her arraignment was on December 7, 2023, and as of now, only one trial date—for the murder of her fourth husband, Charles Vallow—has been set. The second case, involving the attempted murder of her ex-nephew-in-law Brandon Boudreaux, remains in limbo. The clock is ticking, Vallow insists, but for whom remains an open question. After all, she is already serving a life sentence without parole in Idaho for her convictions in the murders of her children, JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan, and her role in the death of Tammy Daybell, the former wife of her current husband, Chad Daybell. With no immediate threat of freedom on the horizon, her newfound urgency over trial delays raises more eyebrows than legal points. A Ticking Clock and a Ticking Off Vallow’s case in Arizona revolves around charges of conspiracy to commit murder. Authorities allege she orchestrated the fatal shooting of Charles Vallow in 2019 with the help of her late brother, Alex Cox, a man whose role in this saga—from trigger-puller to "spiritual warrior"—reads like a plotline even a soap opera writer would reject as over the top. Months later, Brandon Boudreaux narrowly survived an assassination attempt, and police wasted no time connecting the dots back to Vallow’s web of bizarre motives and financial incentives. While Cox conveniently passed away in 2019 under circumstances described as “natural causes,” his posthumous presence looms large in courtrooms across two states. Investigators argue that the shootings were driven by life insurance payouts and a twisted “spiritual” ideology that Vallow and her inner circle allegedly used to justify their actions. Call it faith-based finance, but with a lot more death certificates. Vallow’s self-representation in Arizona follows a December 5 ruling that deemed her competent to stand trial, a decision made after her previous attorneys raised questions about her mental fitness. Now, it’s just Lori, her legal motions, and an audience eager to see if she’ll cross-examine herself at some point. Given her track record, it’s not outside the realm of possibility. Legal Limbo and Looming Trials The Arizona courts find themselves juggling two sets of charges: the conspiracy to murder Charles Vallow and the attempted murder of Brandon Boudreaux. While the former’s trial is scheduled to begin on March 31, the latter remains unscheduled, an omission Vallow’s motion highlights with the fervor of a defendant who’s suddenly discovered their inner legal scholar. Her argument hinges on Arizona’s rules for a speedy trial, claiming the delays violate her rights. For prosecutors, the complications go beyond calendars. Vallow’s conviction in Idaho casts a long shadow over these proceedings, forcing Arizona to grapple with the optics of pursuing justice for additional victims while their star defendant is already destined to spend the rest of her life in prison. Yet, the stakes remain high. For the families of Charles Vallow and Brandon Boudreaux, these trials represent more than just legal closure; they’re a chance to see the full extent of Vallow’s alleged crimes brought to light. A Trial by Irony Vallow’s legal woes in Arizona unfold against a backdrop of prior convictions that would make even the most seasoned true-crime enthusiast’s head spin. In May 2023, an Idaho jury found her guilty of the first-degree murders of her children, 7-year-old JJ and 16-year-old Tylee, whose remains were discovered on Chad Daybell’s property. She was also convicted of conspiracy in the murder of Tammy Daybell, Chad’s former wife, whose death was initially ruled as natural before the autopsy results screamed otherwise. If Arizona hoped to quietly add their charges to the mix, Vallow has other plans. Her motion to dismiss not only delays the proceedings but also ensures that her name remains a headline fixture, a peculiar achievement for someone whose legal arguments hinge on claims of delays. What Happens Next The next chapter in this saga hinges on how the Arizona court responds to Vallow’s motion. If granted, it could derail efforts to hold her accountable for the deaths and attempted murders that continue to ripple through the lives of those left behind. If denied, the state proceeds with its plan to put her on trial for Charles Vallow’s murder in March, while the Boudreaux case waits its turn in the docket. Either way, the “Doomsday Mom” has ensured that her legal theatrics remain must-watch material. A Closing Note on Closure Lori Vallow Daybell’s latest legal maneuvering might not win her any favors in the court of public opinion, but it cements her status as a true-crime phenomenon—one whose trials reflect a tangled web of belief, betrayal, and bloodshed. Whether her motion to dismiss succeeds or flounders, one thing is certain: she’s not done writing her chapter in the annals of criminal infamy. Arizona’s courts, and the families seeking justice within them, now hold the pen. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Duane “Keffe D” Davis, the only person charged in the 1996 murder of hip-hop legend Tupac Shakur, will face trial after a Las Vegas judge denied his motion to dismiss the case. Davis, 61, has been behind bars since being charged in September 2024 with murder with a deadly weapon with intent to promote, further, or assist a criminal gang. Davis’s attorney, Carl Arnold, filed a motion earlier this month to dismiss the case, arguing that prosecutors had delayed proceedings and violated an alleged immunity agreement. Arnold contended that Davis cooperated with federal and local authorities, which should have protected him from prosecution. However, prosecutors pushed back, asserting that Davis lacked proof of any such immunity agreement. In their filing, prosecutors emphasized that Davis “doesn’t have any quantifiable proof” supporting his immunity claims. During the hearing, District Judge Carli Kierny sided with the prosecution, ruling that the state “never gave [Keffe D] immunity.” The judge’s decision clears the way for the case to proceed. Arnold acknowledged the significance of the ruling, stating, “You’re not just going to dismiss the biggest case in the U.S. right off the bat. But you have to put these issues out for an appellate court.” He also hinted at a potential appeal to Nevada’s highest court. The charges against Davis stem from the infamous drive-by shooting near the Las Vegas Strip that killed Tupac Shakur and injured Death Row Records CEO Marion “Suge” Knight. Prosecutors allege the incident was fueled by a rivalry between the South Side Crips, of which Davis was a member, and the Mob Piru gang associated with Death Row Records. The events of that night, according to prosecutors, were set in motion during a brawl at the MGM Grand involving Shakur, Knight, and Davis’s nephew, Orlando Anderson. The altercation reportedly escalated into the deadly shooting that claimed Shakur’s life and left the music world reeling. Davis, who has drawn attention for his detailed public accounts of the incident, is accused of procuring the weapon used in the shooting and providing it to Anderson, who was in the backseat of the car. Anderson, who denied involvement, was killed in an unrelated shooting in 1998, leaving Davis as the last living suspect tied to the crime. The case marks a critical moment in the decades-long investigation into one of music’s most notorious unsolved murders. With the trial looming, fans and observers alike are watching closely for what may finally be the resolution to a mystery that has haunted the hip-hop community for nearly three decades. #TupacMurderTrial #KeffeD #2PacJustice #TupacShakur #HipHopHistory #LasVegasNews #UnsolvedMysteries Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Attorneys for Richard Allen, convicted of the 2017 murders of Liberty German and Abigail Williams in Delphi, Indiana, have filed a Motion to Correct Errors. The motion highlights four alleged legal missteps that they argue are significant enough to overturn the jury’s verdict or warrant a new hearing. Allen was convicted in November 2023 and sentenced the following month to 130 years in prison for the February 13, 2017, murders of the two teenage girls. The case has drawn nationwide attention for its complexity and lengthy investigation. The motion, filed by defense attorneys Andrew Baldwin, Jennifer Auger, and Bradley Rozzi, represents the first formal step toward appealing Allen’s conviction. The defense raises concerns about the legality of Allen’s custody transfer, which occurred after his arrest. They allege the transfer from the Carroll County Jail to the Indiana Department of Corrections was conducted unlawfully, as Allen’s attorney was not notified, denying him the right to legal representation. “Mr. Allen was not afforded either the right to be heard by counsel or by himself at the safekeeping ‘proceeding,’” the motion states. The motion also claims prosecutors failed to correct false testimony concerning a white van seen in the area on the day of the murders. Surveillance footage presented by the defense contradicts the timeline provided by the prosecution, potentially impacting the jury's decision. “When the State introduces testimony it knows will be false or fails to correct testimony it knows or should know to be false, once elicited, a conviction must be vacated or reversed if that false evidence ‘may have had an effect on the outcome of the trial,’” the defense argued. A third issue raised involves a reported confession by another individual in 2017. Notes from an inmate claim that another person confessed to the murders, allegedly mentioning the use of a boxcutter. This claim is significant, given changes in testimony about the murder weapon during Allen’s trial. The defense contends this confession could have established probable cause for an alternative suspect, further undermining the state’s case. Additionally, questions surrounding the forensic analysis of Liberty German’s cellphone have been brought to light. The defense challenges the state’s claims that environmental factors, such as water or dirt, could have caused data suggesting headphones were plugged into the phone at the crime scene. “Ms. Eldridge’s opinion that dirt or water could not have caused L.G.’s phone to log wired headphones being plugged into and being unplugged from the phone on February 13, 2017, exculpates Mr. Allen and would probably produce a different result at a new trial,” the motion argues. The defense seeks either a dismissal of Allen’s convictions or a hearing to address the errors detailed in the motion. This filing is separate from the formal appeal anticipated to be submitted by newly-appointed appellate attorneys for Allen. The court’s response to the motion will determine the next steps in the legal proceedings and the future of Allen’s conviction. #DelphiMurders #TrueCrime #RichardAllenCase #LegalErrors #JusticeForLibbyAndAbby #AppealProcess #CriminalJustice Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Attorneys prosecuting former Letcher County Sheriff Shawn “Mickey” Stines have reported a “voluminous” amount of evidence in their case, which could take up to six months to thoroughly review. Stines, 44, stands accused of murdering his longtime friend, District Judge Kevin Mullins, in Mullins’ office on September 19, 2024. During a virtual court hearing, Stines appeared silent and subdued, wearing a gray jumpsuit, while his attorneys addressed Circuit Court Judge Christopher Cohron. Defense attorney Jeremy Bartley stated that the evidence received from prosecutors is extensive and still under review. Prosecutor Jackie Steele added that additional evidence is being tested, estimating that discovery would be completed within four to six months. The indictment against Stines stems from video footage that allegedly captured him shooting Mullins eight times during a heated exchange inside the judge’s office. The chilling video, presented during an October preliminary hearing, shows Mullins raising his hands in fear and attempting to turn away before being shot. Stines surrendered to authorities without incident shortly after the fatal confrontation and resigned as sheriff 11 days later. The two men, described as longtime friends, reportedly had lunch together hours before the killing. While investigators have not identified a clear motive, they have suggested that a possible “sex scandal” may have influenced the crime. A grand jury formally indicted Stines on one count of murder of a public official in November 2024. Judge Cohron, appointed as a special judge for the case, will oversee the proceedings, including future bond discussions. Bartley indicated during the hearing that the defense plans to request a bond for Stines at a later date. If convicted, Stines could face the death penalty for the killing of Mullins, who was 54 at the time of his death. The case continues to unfold as both sides prepare for what is expected to be a lengthy legal process. #KentuckyNews #ShawnStines #JudgeMurderCase #LegalUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #MurderTrial Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Dave Chappelle brought his signature wit and humor to Saturday Night Live this weekend, taking aim at Sean "Diddy" Combs' recent legal troubles and notorious parties. During his monologue, the comedian addressed Combs’ ongoing criminal charges with biting commentary, poking fun at the rapper’s infamous lifestyle. Chappelle joked that he was never invited to Diddy’s wild gatherings. “A friend asked me, ‘Dave, did you know anything about those freak-off parties?’” he shared during the broadcast. “I thought about it and said, ‘Nah, man, I don’t know anything about the freak-off.’ Then they asked why I wasn’t invited, and I realized, ‘Oh, my God, I’m ugly.’” Chappelle continued, “It’s just no fun being famous anymore. It’s like storming the beaches of Normandy in World War II, but I got to keep a happy expression on my face. The bullets are flying, stuff’s exploding, and I’m like [smiling]. Then, every once in a while, something terrible happens and I’ll be like, ‘Oh, Puffy got hit.’” Combs, founder of Bad Boy Records, was arrested in September and is currently detained at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center. He faces multiple charges, including sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, and transporting individuals for prostitution. The rapper has vehemently denied all accusations and pleaded not guilty. Chappelle’s sharp humor didn’t stop there. Reflecting on the exclusive nature of the parties, he joked, “Can you imagine if you were me, reading a newspaper and finding out everyone in Hollywood had an orgy behind your back? I’m glad they didn’t call me, though, because the stories that are coming out about it are crazy. Clearly, I have snitch energy.” Diddy’s legal team has defended his lifestyle and activities, arguing that they are not criminal. His attorney, Teny Geragos, previously stated during an appearance on NewsNation’s Cuomo, “A lifestyle and being present in activities doesn’t mean he committed a crime. Those activities and the lifestyle is not criminal. What’s notable is they never once said that these women didn’t consent to what happened, not once.” She also highlighted a key difference in the charges against Diddy compared to other high-profile cases, such as those involving R. Kelly or Jeffrey Epstein. “The difference here… no charges relating to minors,” Geragos clarified. Chappelle, known for his fearless approach to controversial topics, struck a chord with his audience, combining humor and pointed commentary. His remarks added another layer to the ongoing conversation about fame, privilege, and accountability in the entertainment industry. #DaveChappelle #SeanCombs #DiddyScandal #SaturdayNightLive #CelebrityNews #HollywoodParties #LegalTroubles Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

A social media influencer from Australia has been accused of poisoning and torturing a 1-year-old girl to solicit thousands of dollars in donations from her followers, Queensland Police announced. The 34-year-old woman, whose identity has not been disclosed, was arrested and charged with several serious offenses. According to police, the influencer administered unauthorized prescription medication to the infant between August 6 and October 15 of last year. The relationship between the woman and the child has not been disclosed, but authorities claim the influencer filmed and posted videos of the child in significant distress to her online platforms, using the harrowing footage to collect approximately $60,000 AUD ($37,000 USD) via GoFundMe. “There is no excuse for harming a child, especially not a one-year-old infant who is reliant on others for care and survival,” said Detective Inspector Paul Dalton in a statement. The case came to light on October 15, when the child was hospitalized with severe physical and emotional distress. Medical staff alerted authorities, triggering an investigation. Tests conducted in January revealed that the child had been exposed to unauthorized medications, further substantiating the allegations. In addition to the physical harm caused, the influencer is accused of committing fraud by misusing the donations she raised through false pretenses. GoFundMe is reportedly working to refund the donors who contributed during the campaign. The woman now faces multiple charges, including five counts of administering poison with intent to harm, three counts of preparation to commit crimes with dangerous things, and single counts of torture, making child exploitation material, and fraud. She appeared in court with her attorney, Mathew Cuskelly, who requested protective custody for his client, citing concerns for her safety due to public attention on the case. “There is some publicity with regards to this matter, and I am concerned with regard to the safety of my client,” Cuskelly told the court. The disturbing allegations have shocked the community, highlighting the darker side of social media influence and the potential for exploitation. While authorities continue their investigation, the case serves as a grim reminder of the need for vigilance in protecting vulnerable individuals, particularly children. The child is reportedly receiving care, but details regarding her current condition remain private. #AustraliaNews #SocialMediaScandal #ChildAbuseAllegations #JusticeForChildren #OnlineFraud #QueenslandPolice #InfluencerArrested Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Convicted killer Scott Peterson appeared before a San Mateo County judge via Zoom as his legal team, led by the Los Angeles Innocence Project, sought approval for DNA testing on key evidence they argue could lead to a new trial. Peterson, convicted of killing his pregnant wife Laci Peterson and their unborn son Connor in 2002, has consistently maintained his innocence. Paula Mitchell, director of the LA Innocence Project, is urging Judge Elizabeth Hill to authorize the testing of several items, including a blood-stained mattress found in a burned-out van near the Modesto airport. Mitchell emphasized that Modesto police failed to investigate whether the van fire was connected to Laci Peterson’s case. Authorities, however, have dismissed any link between the blaze and the murder. The defense also seeks to test evidence recovered near the bodies of Laci and Connor, whose remains surfaced along the Richmond shoreline in 2003, as well as items tied to a burglary across the street from the Petersons’ Modesto home. Peterson’s legal team insists that all requested evidence is available, well-preserved, and maintains an unbroken chain of custody suitable for DNA testing. “This case has always been about getting to the truth, and DNA testing can provide answers that weren’t available during the original trial,” Mitchell stated. Prosecutors oppose the motion, arguing that existing evidence already proved Peterson’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. They point to the jury’s 2004 conviction, which resulted in Peterson being sentenced to life in prison without parole. The trial, relocated from Modesto to San Mateo County due to extensive pretrial publicity, included testimony that Peterson took Laci’s body aboard his boat and dumped it in San Francisco Bay on Christmas Eve 2002. Peterson, who has attended recent hearings from Mule Creek State Prison via Zoom, maintains that he was fishing in the bay on the day of Laci’s disappearance. His defense team asserts that DNA testing could uncover evidence implicating other suspects or provide critical context about items near the crime scene. The case, which gripped national attention from the moment Laci disappeared, continues to polarize public opinion. During the initial investigation, Peterson gave interviews, including a now-famous sit-down with Court TV anchor Ted Rowlands, to plead his innocence. Despite his efforts, mounting evidence led to his arrest and subsequent conviction. Mitchell and the LA Innocence Project remain hopeful that Judge Hill will grant their motion, emphasizing the importance of utilizing modern forensic techniques to ensure justice. “We’re asking for the chance to use tools that weren’t available two decades ago. This isn’t about revisiting old arguments; it’s about finding the truth through science,” Mitchell said. The hearing represents a pivotal moment for Peterson, whose life sentence leaves him few remaining avenues for appeal. As the courtroom battle continues, the legacy of the high-profile case remains a stark reminder of its profound impact on the justice system and public consciousness. #ScottPeterson #InnocenceProject #DNATesting #LaciPeterson #TrueCrime #JusticeForLaci #CrimeNews Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Adam Fravel, convicted of murdering Winona resident Madeline Kingsbury, has begun the appeal process, challenging his conviction and life sentence without parole. Court documents filed by Chief Appellate Public Defender Cathryn Middlebrook confirmed that the Minnesota State Public Defender's Office will represent Fravel in his appeal. On Monday, Judge Nancy Buytendorp approved Middlebrook’s request to access sealed and confidential documents related to the case. Fravel’s decision to appeal comes as no surprise. During his sentencing hearing in December, defense attorney Zachary Bauer signaled Fravel’s intent to challenge the outcome, echoing Fravel’s own claims of innocence. "I never caused harm to Maddi and I am innocent," Fravel declared at the hearing. The appeal follows Fravel’s November conviction on four counts of murder, including two first-degree and two second-degree charges. The case captivated public attention after Kingsbury, a mother of two, vanished on March 31, 2023. Her remains were discovered more than two months later, bound in a ditch. Fravel, the father of her children, was arrested the same day her body was found. Testimonies during the trial painted a troubling picture of Fravel and Kingsbury’s relationship. Friends and family members described a pattern of abuse, including allegations that Fravel threatened Kingsbury with harm, warning she might "end up like Gabby Petito," a woman whose high-profile murder by her fiancé in 2021 drew national attention. Fravel is currently held at the Minnesota Correctional Facility in St. Cloud. The public and Kingsbury’s loved ones continue to monitor developments as the appeal process unfolds. #MadelineKingsbury #AdamFravel #TrueCrime #JusticeForMaddi #MinnesotaNews #DomesticAbuse #MurderAppeal Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Wendy Williams didn’t hold back during a rare interview on The Breakfast Club, where she addressed Sean “Diddy” Combs’ mounting legal troubles, her personal experiences with the music mogul, and her ongoing fight for independence amid health challenges. Host Charlamagne tha God revisited Williams’ controversial departure from Hot 97 in 1998, suggesting that Diddy played a role in her firing. Williams confirmed the speculation, stating, “Diddy will go to prison for life, people.” “You don’t know things I knew about Diddy back in the day,” she continued. “And you want to know what? It’s about time, people, it is about time. Diddy done.” Williams did not elaborate further on what she claimed to know about Combs, but her comments added to the growing discourse surrounding the embattled music mogul. Combs, who was arrested in September on sex-trafficking charges, has pleaded not guilty and is currently in jail awaiting trial, which is set to begin May 5. In addition to the criminal charges, Combs faces dozens of lawsuits alleging sexual misconduct, including a new claim that he drugged and raped a 16-year-old girl in 2000. In response to the allegations, Combs’ legal team has denied any wrongdoing. “No amount of lawsuits against our client will change the fact that Mr. Combs has never sexually assaulted, or sex-trafficked anyone—man or woman, adult or minor,” his lawyers said in a statement to Rolling Stone. Williams’ history with Combs dates back decades. In her 2004 book The Wendy Williams Experience, she alleged that Combs tried to sabotage her career during her tenure at Hot 97. Speaking to New York magazine in 2005, Williams said it was her “belief” that Combs played a role in her dismissal, referencing rumors she had spread about his sexuality. Following Combs’ recent arrest, Williams claimed vindication. “Multiple people told me I called it,” she told the Daily Mail in November. She also criticized footage from 2016 that appeared to show Combs physically assaulting his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. “But now you have to think, how many more times? How many people? How many more women? It’s just so horrible,” she said. During the interview, Williams also opened up about her own struggles. Her TV show was canceled in 2022 following a series of health-related absences. She has since been placed under guardianship and was diagnosed with aphasia and frontotemporal dementia. However, Williams remains defiant, telling The Breakfast Club, “I feel like I’m in prison. I’m not cognitively impaired.” Her remarks sparked both support and controversy, adding another chapter to the ongoing saga of two public figures navigating turmoil. #WendyWilliams #SeanCombs #Diddy #LegalTroubles #Hot97 #EntertainmentNews #CelebrityControversy Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Lawyers for Bryan Kohberger, the man accused of killing four University of Idaho students, have filed a motion to partially lift the "veil of secrecy" surrounding the high-profile case. The defense team aims to make public records related to DNA evidence and investigative genetic genealogy techniques used by law enforcement. “This matter is of utmost importance to Mr. Kohberger’s right to a public hearing,” attorney Elisa Massoth wrote in a court filing Thursday. "Holding the hearing in open court will not prejudice the parties, and this should be held in open court." Kohberger, who was a criminology Ph.D. student at Washington State University, is charged with four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. Prosecutors allege that on November 13, 2022, he broke into an off-campus home in Moscow, Idaho, and fatally stabbed Ethan Chapin, 20; Madison Mogen, 21; Xana Kernodle, 20; and Kaylee Goncalves, 21. Following a six-week investigation, Kohberger was arrested on December 30, 2022, at his family’s home in Pennsylvania. The case garnered national and international attention, with significant public interest in the methods used to identify him as a suspect. Central to the defense’s motion is the controversial use of investigative genetic genealogy, which law enforcement employed to link Kohberger to the crime. This method involves building a "family tree" using publicly available DNA databases to identify potential suspects. Prosecutors allege that Kohberger’s DNA, found on a knife sheath at the crime scene, matched a cheek swab collected after his arrest. Kohberger’s legal team contests the validity of the genetic genealogy process, calling it unconstitutional and claiming that the DNA evidence was "illegally gathered." They are requesting that the court suppress this evidence, arguing it should not be presented to the jury in the death penalty trial set for August. Massoth emphasized the importance of transparency in the case, stating, “Due to national and international attention to this case, and in the interest of protecting Mr. Kohberger’s right to a fair trial, many pleadings in this case have been sealed.” She added that both Kohberger and the public have a “right to know how genetic information was used in this case.” Two critical hearings are scheduled in the coming days. On January 23, a pretrial hearing will address unresolved evidentiary issues, including the DNA dispute. Before that, a closed-door session will determine whether the request to disclose genetic genealogy materials will proceed. “In addition to Mr. Kohberger’s right to a public trial, the public has a First Amendment right to know what goes on in its courts,” Massoth stated in the filing. Prosecutors argue that the genetic genealogy process provided a significant lead in identifying Kohberger and connecting him to the crime scene. They assert that the DNA evidence, a "statistical match," is a key component of their case. As the legal battle over the admissibility and transparency of this evidence continues, the court’s decision could have far-reaching implications for the trial and for the use of genetic genealogy in criminal investigations. #IdahoMurders #BryanKohberger #DNAEvidence #TrueCrime #CollegeMurders #GeneticGenealogy #FairTrial Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Lawyers for Sean 'Diddy' Combs are taking aim at the prosecution’s narrative in the high-profile sex trafficking case against the hip-hop mogul, calling it "sexist and puritanical." In a letter to a Manhattan federal judge, the defense team argued that nine key video recordings allegedly proving the charges depict consensual adult activities and not criminal acts. "Any fair-minded viewer of the videos will quickly conclude that the prosecution of Mr. Combs is both sexist and puritanical," the lawyers wrote, asserting that the government's case perpetuates "stereotypes of female victimhood and lack of agency." Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to sex trafficking charges stemming from allegations that he organized "elaborate and produced sex performances" referred to as "Freak Offs." Prosecutors allege these encounters were orchestrated by Combs, involved male sex workers, and were accompanied by drug use to "keep the victims obedient and compliant." The indictment describes "Freak Offs" as events lasting days, with participants drugged, recorded, and provided with items like baby oil and lubricant—over 1,000 bottles of which were allegedly found during raids of Combs’ Los Angeles and Miami homes. Combs’ legal team challenges this portrayal, stating that the nine videos, supplied by a woman identified as "Victim-1," depict consensual and voluntary interactions. "In all six of these encounters," the lawyers wrote, "Victim-1 is not only consenting; she is evidently happy, dominant, and completely in control." They emphasized that the recordings show no signs of violence, coercion, or incapacitation. The defense also argued that the videos lack evidence of orgies, minors, or the involvement of other celebrities, countering claims that the events were exploitative. The legal team criticized the government for allegedly policing "non-conforming sexual activity" and assuming that "a woman's willing participation must have been coerced." Combs has been held without bail since his September arrest, with multiple judges denying his release. His trial is scheduled for May 5. Defense lawyers are requesting further access to the videos, noting that they’ve only been allowed to review them twice over the past two months. They contend that the recordings, described as "quite dark and grainy," require expert analysis to enhance the quality and verify metadata. The prosecution has not commented on the defense’s recent submission. Combs’ attorneys argue that the government's portrayal depends on characterizing the sex performances as "dirty, disgusting, or inherently unsavory." They maintain that the evidence contradicts the prosecution’s claims of trafficking and coercion, portraying their client as a target of overreach and societal bias. #SeanCombs #LegalBattle #SexTraffickingCase #ConsensualActivity #JusticeForDiddy #LegalDefense #SexualAgency Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a highly anticipated revelation, R&B singer Al B. Sure! speaks out for the first time about Sean "Diddy" Combs in the new Peacock documentary Diddy: The Making of a Bad Boy. The "Nite and Day" artist shares shocking claims, including allegations about Diddy's behavior, his ex Kim Porter’s fears, and the broader music industry's hidden dangers. “For the record, I received more than 40 inquiries from production companies and networks since brother Sean’s incarceration,” Al B. Sure! explains in the film. “I decided to speak out because I owe it to the late Kim Porter to share the truth.” Al B. Sure! and Porter, the biological parents of actor and musician Quincy Brown, maintained a close relationship even after their romantic involvement ended. Porter later dated Diddy, with whom she had three children. Porter, a model and former Uptown Records colleague of Diddy, reportedly confided in Al B. Sure! about her growing unease regarding the music mogul. “She did say that something’s not right. His soul was going completely dark, like he’s just not there,” Al B. Sure! shares. He claims Porter made him promise, on their son Quincy’s life, not to disclose what she revealed, fearing for his safety. The singer-songwriter also alleges Porter kept detailed notes about her experiences with Diddy. “She was keeping a diary and things of that nature. Someone got the passcode to her phone and computer and found out she was writing what was going on behind closed doors,” he says. Porter tragically passed away in 2018 at 47 years old. The Los Angeles County Coroner's Office determined her death resulted from lobar pneumonia, but Al B. Sure! disputes this. “That’s just a day that will never, ever leave my mind. And just that empty feeling of like, ‘Nah, something is not right with this.’” The documentary delves into broader accusations, with Al B. Sure! hinting at sinister patterns within the music industry. “Let’s just say there’s a lot to uncover, a lot that goes on in the industry, which is not my job to uncover. But it’s something that’s been going on, and those who speak about it usually meet their demise.” In response, Diddy’s legal team categorically denied all allegations presented in the documentary. “This documentary recycles and perpetuates the same lies and conspiracy theories that have been slung against Mr. Combs for months. It is disappointing to see NBC and Peacock rolling in the same mud as unethical tabloid reporters. By providing a platform for proven liars and opportunists to make false criminal accusations, the documentary is irresponsible journalism of the worst kind,” they stated to Extra. Al B. Sure! also recounts his own near-death experience in 2020, alleging foul play. “I was in a coma, having multi-system organ failure. Every organ is working off of a machine, except for the liver,” he reveals. The singer suggests someone attempted to take his life. “I kept a record of every single one of you who was sent to set me up, to assist in the attempted murder of Al B. Sure!” Sean "Diddy" Combs, currently jailed at Brooklyn’s Metropolitan Detention Center, faces federal charges of racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges and awaits trial in May 2025. Al B. Sure!'s revelations come as a significant addition to the ongoing conversation surrounding Diddy, shedding light on alleged misconduct and raising questions about the treatment of those who dare to speak out in the entertainment industry. #Diddy #AlBSure #KimPorter #MusicIndustry #SeanCombs #PeacockDocumentary #EntertainmentNews Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

A South Carolina federal judge has ordered Alex Murdaugh and his accomplice, Cory Fleming, to pay millions for orchestrating an insurance fraud scheme that stole over $4 million meant for the family of Murdaugh’s housekeeper, Gloria Satterfield. Judge Richard Gergel issued a $14.8 million judgment against Murdaugh and a $3.75 million judgment against Fleming, a former attorney and longtime friend of Murdaugh. These judgments followed a civil trial brought by Nautilus Insurance Company, which sought damages from the fraudulent scheme. The case began after Satterfield’s fatal fall on the front steps of Murdaugh’s hunting estate, Moselle. Murdaugh convinced Satterfield’s sons to file a claim against his insurance, promising compensation. Instead, Murdaugh and Fleming embezzled the settlement funds, leaving the family empty-handed. Murdaugh admitted to fabricating a story about his dogs causing Satterfield’s death to create liability and secure insurance payouts. “He intended to, and did in fact, steal,” Judge Gergel noted in his January 2 ruling. Fleming faced trial for his role in facilitating the fraud. The court found that he committed “multiple acts of unfair and deceptive practices” and acted willfully in violating the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act. While a jury initially awarded $1.25 million in damages, Gergel tripled the amount to $3.75 million, citing the severity of Fleming’s actions. “Fleming’s unfair and deceptive acts played a critical role in Murdaugh’s ability to ultimately steal over $4 million in settlement funds,” Gergel stated in the settlement order. The fraudulent settlement funds were part of over 100 financial crimes tied to Murdaugh, including millions stolen from his law firm clients. These crimes have compounded the disgraced attorney’s legal troubles. Murdaugh is already serving two life sentences for the 2021 murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. Prosecutors argued the murders were a distraction to hide his mounting financial crimes. While Murdaugh appeals his double murder convictions, the financial fraud cases continue to unfold. Nautilus Insurance Company’s lawsuit against other entities linked to the Satterfield scheme remains active. The Gloria Satterfield case has become a cornerstone of the unraveling Murdaugh crime saga, symbolizing the betrayal of trust by two lawyers who exploited a grieving family for personal gain. #AlexMurdaugh #GloriaSatterfield #InsuranceFraud #CoryFleming #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #LegalNews Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Music mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs has been named in a new lawsuit alleging the rape of a 16-year-old girl in 2000, adding to a growing list of sexual misconduct accusations against him. The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe, claims that as a high school student in Lower Manhattan, she encountered Combs while working as a babysitter in the same apartment building where Combs' then-romantic partner resided. According to the lawsuit, Combs offered the teenager a ride home multiple times, which she initially declined. After persistent offers, she accepted. Instead of taking her home, the lawsuit alleges that Combs, accompanied by two unnamed male employees, drove her to a different location. During the ride, she was offered a drink to "calm her down," which led her to feel "groggy" and "unsteady." The plaintiff alleges that Combs then raped her before she was returned to her apartment building and left in the lobby. This lawsuit is among more than 30 filed against Combs, accusing him of various forms of sexual misconduct. Combs' legal team has consistently denied these allegations. In a statement to PEOPLE, his attorneys asserted: "No matter how many lawsuits are filed, it won't change the fact that Mr. Combs has never sexually assaulted, or sex trafficked anyone—man or woman, adult or minor." They emphasized confidence in the judicial process, stating that Combs "is confident he will prevail in court." Currently, Combs is detained in Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center, awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking and racketeering charges. He has pleaded not guilty to these charges, with the trial scheduled for May 5, 2025. The mounting legal challenges have significantly impacted Combs' public image and business ventures. Once a dominant figure in the music industry, his reputation has been marred by these serious allegations. The entertainment community and the public are closely monitoring the developments in these cases. The recent lawsuit also highlights the broader issue of sexual misconduct within the entertainment industry, prompting discussions about power dynamics and the protection of minors. As the legal proceedings continue, the focus remains on the testimonies of the accusers and the defense mounted by Combs' legal team. The outcome of these cases may have far-reaching implications for the industry and for survivors seeking justice. Combs' attorneys have reiterated their stance, stating: "We live in a world where anyone can file a lawsuit for any reason. Fortunately, a fair and impartial judicial process exists to find the truth, and Mr. Combs is confident he will prevail in court." As the trial date approaches, both sides are preparing for a legal battle that will be closely watched by many. The allegations against Combs span decades, with accusers coming forward with stories of abuse, coercion, and assault. The legal proceedings are expected to shed light on these claims and determine the veracity of the accusations. The entertainment industry continues to grapple with issues of misconduct, and the cases against Combs serve as a reminder of the importance of accountability and justice for survivors. As the situation unfolds, further updates will provide insight into the legal strategies employed and the responses from both the accusers and the defense. The upcoming trial in May 2025 will be a pivotal moment in addressing the serious allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs. #Diddy #SeanCombs #SexualAssaultAllegations #JaneDoe #Justice #TrueCrime #Accountability Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Actor Alec Baldwin has filed a civil lawsuit against Santa Fe District Attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies, Special Prosecutor Kari Morrissey, and other officials, claiming malicious prosecution and violations of his civil rights. The lawsuit follows the dismissal of criminal charges against Baldwin in connection with the 2021 death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of Rust. Baldwin was holding a prop pistol during a rehearsal when it discharged, killing Hutchins and wounding director Joel Souza. Baldwin faced an involuntary manslaughter charge, which was thrown out in July by Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer. The judge cited prosecutorial misconduct, including the withholding of key evidence related to the live ammunition on set. The lawsuit, filed Thursday, names additional defendants, including investigators from the Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office, the First Judicial District Attorney’s Office, the Santa Fe County Board of Commissioners, and the county itself. In the filing, Baldwin’s attorneys accuse prosecutors of engaging in a “malicious and unlawful” pursuit of the actor for political and personal reasons. “Criminal prosecutions are supposed to be about the search for truth and justice, not to pursue personal or political gain or harass the innocent,” attorneys Luke Nikas and Alex Spiro stated. “Kari Morrissey and the other defendants violated that basic principle, over and over, and trampled on Alec Baldwin’s rights. We bring this action to hold the defendants accountable for their misconduct and to prevent them from doing this to anyone else.” The lawsuit alleges that prosecutors intentionally concealed evidence that would have cleared Baldwin and instead sought to scapegoat him for Hutchins’ death. Special Prosecutor Andrea Reeb is accused of making statements about how pursuing the case could benefit her political career as a Republican state representative. Baldwin’s attorneys claim that false and incomplete testimony from Morrissey was used to secure his indictment. Responding to the lawsuit, Morrissey said, “In October 2023, the prosecution team became aware that Mr. Baldwin intended to file a retaliatory civil lawsuit. We look forward to our day in court.” The incident, which occurred during the filming of the Western Rust, reignited debates about firearms safety on film sets and led to multiple lawsuits, including Baldwin’s. The actor is seeking financial damages through a jury trial, arguing that the defendants must be held accountable for their actions. “Defendants must now be held accountable for their malicious and unlawful pursuit of Baldwin,” the complaint states. The tragic shooting of Halyna Hutchins has left a lasting impact on Hollywood, with many calling for stricter safety protocols. Baldwin’s lawsuit underscores broader concerns about the role of political influence and prosecutorial accountability in high-profile cases. #AlecBaldwin #RustLawsuit #HalynaHutchins #CivilRights #MaliciousProsecution #MovieSetSafety #Hollywood Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

A new Peacock documentary, Diddy: The Making of a Bad Boy, delves into the life of Sean “Diddy” Combs, offering fresh perspectives on his youth and rise to fame while confronting recent controversies surrounding the music icon. Tim Patterson, a childhood friend, painted a vivid picture of Diddy’s early years in Mount Vernon, New York. “I know Sean, not Diddy, not Daddy Love,” Patterson shared in the film. “I have to tell people about what they don’t know about his childhood.” He described young Sean as a wealthy outlier, often bullied due to his privileged background. “Sean was the different kid. People could smell he wasn’t tough,” he added. The documentary explores how Diddy’s father, Melvin Combs, was killed in what former bodyguard Gene Deal described as a retaliation for cooperating with law enforcement. This loss left Janice Combs, Diddy’s mother, to raise her children alone. Patterson explained that Janice’s inheritance allowed the family to move to a more affluent area, fostering a life of luxury for her son. “He was the one in the hat, with jewelry on, at four years old,” Patterson remarked about an old photo. Diddy’s childhood also involved exposure to lively, unconventional environments. “Sean’s house was the party spot,” Patterson recalled, citing wild gatherings that mirrored the flamboyant celebrations Diddy would later host as an adult. According to Lee Davis, a friend and DJ, “She made sure everybody was comfortable,” though Janice Combs did not comment on her portrayal in the documentary. The film highlights Diddy’s relentless ambition, which emerged during his time at Howard University. Ron Lawrence, a college classmate, noted that Diddy declared, “I’m gonna be the biggest record producer in the world.” His determination paid off after dropping out of college and securing an internship at Uptown Records in 1990. Patterson recalled, “He’d show up anywhere to get the bigwigs’ attention—even sleeping outside of Andre Harrell’s car.” Despite his success, Diddy’s legacy faces challenges. In September 2024, he was arrested on charges of sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, and transportation to engage in prostitution. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges, and his representatives vehemently deny the allegations. “This documentary recycles and perpetuates the same lies and conspiracy theories,” a spokesperson told Us Weekly, criticizing NBC and Peacock for amplifying what they view as baseless claims. The documentary premieres on Peacock on January 14, offering a multifaceted view of one of music’s most influential and polarizing figures. While it unearths stories of childhood resilience, ambition, and transformation, it also raises questions about the darker chapters of Diddy’s life. #SeanCombs #DiddyDocumentary #MountVernon #MusicMogul #Peacock #HipHopHistory #Controversy Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Convicted murderer Lori Daybell returned to court Friday, asserting her right to represent herself in Arizona as she faces charges for the murder of her fourth husband, Charles Vallow, and the attempted murder of her niece’s ex-husband, Brandon Boudreaux. During the hearing in Phoenix, Daybell, already serving life sentences in Idaho for the murders of her two youngest children and her fifth husband’s first wife, stood firm in her decision to self-represent. She clarified to the court that she wishes to be addressed as Lori Daybell, using her fifth husband Chad Daybell’s last name. Chad Daybell was sentenced to death in Idaho for his role in the murders. Prosecutors are preparing for the first trial focusing on Charles Vallow’s murder, with jury selection scheduled for March 31. “The Defense intends on starting trial without delay,” Daybell told the court. Prosecutors anticipate their case-in-chief will take several weeks, depending on how long Daybell, acting as her own attorney, takes to cross-examine witnesses. Judge Justin Beresky acknowledged the complexity of scheduling, noting that a second trial date for the attempted murder of Boudreaux will depend on the duration of the first trial. “It’s hard to set the second one without knowing how long the first one’s going to take,” he said. Daybell made her presence felt in court, hand-filing two motions requesting additional discovery from prosecutors. One motion sought documents related to her extradition from Idaho to Arizona. Judge Beresky denied the motion, stating the materials were not relevant to the current charges. Despite these setbacks, Daybell appeared resolute. Her choice to represent herself, a rare and risky move in high-stakes criminal cases, has drawn significant public attention. Legal analysts have highlighted the challenges she will face, including navigating complex legal procedures and cross-examining witnesses. As her trial date approaches, Daybell’s courtroom maneuvers will undoubtedly remain under intense scrutiny. Her ability to present a coherent defense while grappling with the weight of public opinion and her criminal history may shape the outcome of these proceedings. #LoriDaybell #ArizonaTrial #CharlesVallow #BrandonBoudreaux #SelfRepresentation #TrueCrime #MurderTrial Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Osceola County Sheriff Marcos Lopez has been added to the Brady List by Andrew Bain, former Orange-Osceola state attorney, following conflicting statements Lopez made about a crime scene photo in the case of 13-year-old Madeline Soto. The Brady List is a tool used to notify legal parties when a witness’s credibility or truthfulness may be in doubt, potentially affecting court proceedings. In a December 30 letter, Bain informed Lopez of his inclusion on the list due to inconsistent explanations about a photo of Soto's body that was mistakenly posted on social media. The move could have significant implications for the death penalty case against Stephen Sterns, accused of Soto’s murder, where Lopez is listed as a witness. The controversy began in July 2024 when Bain warned Lopez that he might be added to the Brady List. Lopez initially told Kissimmee’s police chief and the public that the photo was posted by mistake, issuing an apology. However, during a radio interview with WDBO, Lopez stated, “As to the photo, there was an apology issued but it wasn’t actually the body, it was an area of interest where there was a body found. No one ever came out directly and said it was the victim.” Days later, in a sworn interview with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Lopez acknowledged having the photo sent to his phone to compare the clothing on the body with what Soto was last seen wearing. Bain flagged these discrepancies as problematic for Lopez’s credibility. In the December letter, Bain also criticized an internal memorandum from the Osceola Sheriff’s Office that exonerated Lopez, stating it lacked objectivity and bypassed formal investigative protocols. “Adopting the reading the Memo does in this case suggests the Osceola Sheriff’s Office does not care if an employee or member is truthful when answering questions outside the chain of command or, say, to the media. I cannot believe that is the case,” Bain wrote. Bain further argued that Lopez’s statement to WDBO appeared to downplay the incident and shift blame. He wrote, “To be clear, the concerning statement in your interview is your assertion that ‘[n]o one ever came out directly and said it [the photograph] was the victim.’ When viewed in this proper context, it is hard to read your immediate answer as anything but an attempt to claim the photo you posted was not the victim in an attempt to lessen your public responsibility for a violation of Florida public records laws.” In addition to being added to the Brady List, Lopez was fined $250 last month for violating Florida’s public records laws in connection with the photo’s disclosure. Bain emphasized that the conflicting statements could be used to impeach Lopez’s credibility as a witness in Sterns’ trial. The Osceola County Sheriff’s Office responded to Bain’s decision with a statement: “The Sheriff’s Office completely disagrees with Andrew Bain’s decision. The perspectives mentioned in his letter have no merit, and the Sheriff will be appealing his decision. No other statement is available at this time.” The Brady List designation places added scrutiny on Lopez and his role in the high-profile case. The decision also underscores ongoing concerns about accountability and transparency within law enforcement as Soto’s family seeks justice. #BradyList #AndrewBain #MarcosLopez #MadelineSoto #OsceolaSheriff #PublicRecords #FloridaLaw Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com